Generalizing the AGM postulates: preliminary results and applications

نویسندگان

  • Giorgos Flouris
  • Dimitris Plexousakis
  • Grigoris Antoniou
چکیده

One of the crucial actions any reasoning system must undertake is the updating of its Knowledge Base (KB). This problem is usually referred to as the problem of belief change. The AGM approach, introduced in (Alchourron, Gärdenfors, and Makinson 1985), is the dominating paradigm in the area but it makes some non-elementary assumptions about the logic at hand which disallow its direct application in some classes of logics. In this paper, we drop all such assumptions and determine the necessary and sufficient conditions for a logic to support AGMcompliant operators. Our approach is directly applicable to a much broader class of logics. We apply our results to establish connections between the problem of updating in Description Logics (DLs) and the AGM postulates. Finally, we investigate why belief base operators cannot satisfy the AGM postulates in standard logics.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On Generalizing the AGM Postulates

The AGM theory is the dominating paradigm in the field of belief change but makes some non-elementary assumptions which disallow its application to certain logics. In this paper, we recast the theory by dropping most such assumptions; we determine necessary and sufficient conditions for a logic to support operators which are compatible with our generalized version of the theory and show that ou...

متن کامل

Generalizing AGM to a multi-agent setting

We generalize AGM belief revision theory to the multi-agent case. To do so, we first generalize the semantics of the single-agent case, based on the notion of interpretation, to the multi-agent case. Then we show that, thanks to the shape of our new semantics, all the results of the AGM framework transfer. Afterwards we investigate some postulates that are specific to our multi-agent setting. F...

متن کامل

Iterated Belief Revision: A Computational Approach

The capability of revising its beliefs upon new information in a rational and efficient way is crucial for an intelligent agent. The classic AGM theory studies mathematically idealized models of belief revision in two aspects: the properties (i.e., the AGM postulates) a rational revision operator should satisfy; and how to construct concrete revision operators. In scenarios where new informatio...

متن کامل

AGM Postulates in Arbitrary Logics: Initial Results and Applications

The problem of belief change refers to the updating of a Knowledge Base (KB) in the face of new, possibly contradictory information. The AGM theory, introduced in [1], is the dominating paradigm in the area of belief change. Unfortunately, the assumptions made by the authors of [1] in the formulation of their theory restrict its use to a specific class of logics. In this report, we investigate ...

متن کامل

On Iterated Revision in the AGM Framework

While AGM belief revision identifies belief states with sets of formulas, proposals for iterated revision are usually based on more complex belief states. In this paper we investigate within the AGM framework several postulates embodying some aspects of iterated revision. Our main results are negative: when added to the AGM postulates, our postulates force revision to be maxichoice (whenever th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004